A imagem mostra a capa de um livro intitulado “AVALIAÇÃO DE TECNOLOGIAS: ABORDAGENS E PESQUISAS”.
Descargas
Volumen
Avaliação de tecnologias: abordagens e pesquisas
Páginas
59-77
Publicado
noviembre 7, 2026
Derechos de autor 2026 Editora ABEn

Cómo citar

LIMA, Eliane de Fátima Almeida; SOUZA, Maria Helena do Nascimento; AMORIM, Lidiane Dias Freire; PRIMO, Cândida Caniçali. CIÊNCIA DA IMPLEMENTAÇÃO NA ENFERMAGEM: CONCEITOS, APLICAÇÃO E PERSPECTIVAS FUTURAS. In: TEIXEIRA, Elizabeth; NASCIMENTO, Marcia Helena Machado; SALBEGO, Cléton; PRIMO, Candida Caniçali. Avaliação de tecnologias: abordagens e pesquisas. Brasília, Brasil: Editora ABEn,2026. p. 59–77. DOI: 10.51234/aben.26.e32_cap5. Disponível em: https://editoraaben.abennacional.org.br/editora/catalog/book/53/chapter/401. Acesso em: 15 nov. 2026.

CIÊNCIA DA IMPLEMENTAÇÃO NA ENFERMAGEM: CONCEITOS, APLICAÇÃO E PERSPECTIVAS FUTURAS

Autores/as

Eliane de Fátima Almeida Lima

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5128-3715

Maria Helena do Nascimento Souza

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-3048

Lidiane Dias Freire Amorim

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2748-3081

Cândida Caniçali Primo

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5141-2898
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51234/aben.26.e32_cap5
Sinopsis

A Ciência da Implementação não surgiu de forma isolada, mas resultou da convergência de diferentes tradições de pesquisa voltadas à compreensão de como conhecimentos, inovações e políticas são incorporados à prática. Entre suas principais bases teóricas, destaca-se a pesquisa sobre difusão de inovações, consolidada a partir dos trabalhos de Rogers e, posteriormente, reconhecida como um dos pilares para a compreensão dos processos de adoção e disseminação de práticas baseadas em evidências nos serviços de saúde (1).

Referencias

1. Chambers DA, Emmons KM. Navigating the field of implementation science towards maturity: challenges and opportunities. Implement Sci. 2024;19:26. doi:10.1186/s13012-024-01352-0.

2. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models, and frameworks. In: Albers B, Shlonsky A, Mildon R, editors. Implementation Science 3.0. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 53-79. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03874-8_3.

3. Wang Y, Wong EL-Y, Nilsen P, Chung VC, Tian Y, Yeoh E-K. A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks: an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability. Implement Sci. 2023;18:43. doi:10.1186/s13012-023-01296-x.

4. Freitas De Mello N, Nascimento Silva S, Gomes DF, Da Motta Girardi J, Barreto JOM. Models and frameworks for assessing the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2024;19:59. doi:10.1186/s13012-024-01389-1.

5. Proctor EK, Bunger AC, Lengnick-Hall R, Gerke DR, Martin JK, Phillips RJ, et al. Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2023;18:31. doi:10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z.

6. Curran GM. Implementation science made too simple: a teaching tool. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1:27. doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00001-z.

7. Kuo GM, Trinkley KE, Rabin B. Research and scholarly methods: implementation science studies. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2022;5(9):995-1004. doi:10.1002/jac5.1673.

8. Rapport F, Clay-Williams R, Churruca K, Shih P, Hogden A, Braithwaite J. The struggle of translating science into action: foundational concepts of implementation science. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(1):117-126. doi:10.1111/jep.12741.

9. Leeman J, Birken SA, Powell BJ, Rohweder C, Shea CM. Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implement Sci. 2017;12:125. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0657-x.

10. Schmitt M, Hawkins M, Florsheim P. Key determinants in implementation processes: a systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Implement Sci Commun. 2025;6:89. doi:10.1186/s43058-025-00712-1.

11. Fernandez ME, Ten Hoor GA, Van Lieshout S, Rodriguez SA, Beidas RS, Parcel G, et al. Implementation Mapping: using Intervention Mapping to develop implementation strategies. Front Public Health. 2019;7:158. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158.

12. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.

13. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65-76. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.

14. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13-24. doi:10.1002/chp.47.

15. Fixsen DL, Blase KA, Naoom SF, Wallace F. Core implementation components. Res Soc Work Pract. 2009;19(5):531-540. doi:10.1177/1049731509335549.

16. Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:4-23. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.

17. Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Haines ER, Alexis Kirk M, Leeman J, et al. Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci. 2017;12:124. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0656-y.

18. Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Albers B, Nilsen P, Broder-Fingert S, et al. Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice. Implement Sci Commun. 2020;1:42. doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00023-7.

19. Fontaine G, Mooney M, Porat-Dahlerbruch J, Cahir K, Ellen M, Spinewine A, et al. Advancing the selection of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks: a scoping review and the development of the SELECT-IT meta-framework. Implement Sci. 2025;20:24. doi:10.1186/s13012-025-01436-5.

20. Vieira ACG, Gastaldo D, Harrison D. How to translate scientific knowledge into practice? Concepts, models and application. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(5):e20190179. doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0179.

21. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Diretriz metodológica: síntese de evidências para políticas [Internet]. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2020 [citado 12 jul 2026]. 70 p. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/diretriz_sintese_evidencias_politicas.pdf.

22. Porritt K, McArthur A, Lockwood C, Munn Z. JBI’s approach to evidence implementation: a 7-phase process model to support and guide getting evidence into practice. JBI Evid Implement. 2023;21(1):3-13. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000361.

23. Kossinna C, Lau CL, Mayr HL, Wilkinson SA, Young AM, Meloncelli N, et al. Application of the Knowledge-to-Action framework in translating nutrition and dietetic knowledge into practice: a systematic review. Nutr Clin Pract. 2025;40(6):1276-1300. doi:10.1002/ncp.70016.

24. Stasiulis E, Naglie G, Sanford S, Belchior P, Crizzle A, Gélinas I, et al. Developing the Driving and Dementia Roadmap: a knowledge-to-action process. Int Psychogeriatr. 2024;36(12):1157-1170. doi:10.1017/S1041610222001235.

25. Cubis L, McDonald S, Dean P, Ramme R, D’Cruz K, Topping M, et al. Using the Knowledge to Action framework to improve housing and support for people with multiple sclerosis. Brain Impair. 2024;25(3):IB23102. doi:10.1071/IB23102.

26. Obrecht L, Van Abswoude F, Klingels K, Steenbergen B. Advancing knowledge translation processes in motor rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy and developmental coordination disorder: insights from a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026;26:725. doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14488-0.

27. Stirling RG, Melder A, Eyles E, Reich M, Dawkins P. An exploration of the utility and impacts of implementation science strategies by cancer registries for healthcare improvement: a systematic review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13(1):1-12. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.8297.

28. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.

29. Reardon CM, Damschroder LJ, Ashcraft LE, Kerins C, Bachrach RL, Nevedal AL, et al. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) User Guide: a five-step guide for conducting implementation research using the framework. Implement Sci. 2025;20:39. doi:10.1186/s13012-025-01450-7.

30. Fracolli LA, Oliveira LGF, Anjos TSD, Timmons S, Nichiata LYI, Gryschek ALDFPL, et al. Intervening conditions of the implementation of an Advanced Access Model: an implementation research. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2024;45(spe1):e20240066. doi:10.1590/1983-1447.2024.20240066.en.

31. Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17:75. doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.

32. Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Opra Widerquist MA, Lowery J. Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum. Implement Sci. 2022;17:7. doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5.

33. Rosenblum RE, Rogal SS, Park ER, Impagliazzo C, Abdulhay LB, Grosse PJ, et al. National survey using CFIR to assess early outpatient specialty palliative care implementation. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023;65(3):e175-e180. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.019.

34. Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016;11:33. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2.

35. Huang Q, Mitchell C, Theodoulou E, Lee ACK, Brown J. Implementation of fracture risk assessment in men with prostate cancer requiring long-term androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic scoping review using the i-PARIHS implementation framework. J Cancer Surviv. 2024;20:399-414. doi:10.1007/s11764-024-01659-3.

36. Young AM, Byrnes A, McRae P, Mudge A. Use of the i-PARIHS framework in nutrition and dietetics research and practice: a citation analysis of the literature and case studies. Nutr Clin Pract. 2025;40(6):1301-1322. doi:10.1002/ncp.70030.

37. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-139.

38. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.

39. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernández ME, Abadie B, Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019;14:42. doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.

40. Leeman J, Rohweder C, Lafata JE, Wangen M, Ferrari R, Shea CM, et al. A streamlined approach to classifying and tailoring implementation strategies. Implement Sci Commun. 2024;5:65. doi:10.1186/s43058-024-00606-8.

41. Meng M, Wang Z, Yang D, Jiang H, Lu J, Chen S, et al. Application status of the CFIR-ERIC matching tool in healthcare context: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2026;21:23. doi:10.1186/s13012-026-01490-7.

42. Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, Porter GC, et al. RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front Public Health. 2019;7:64. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064.

43. Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017;12:108. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

44. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-1327. doi:10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322.

45. Silva ESD, Primo CC, Gimbel S, Almeida MVDS, Oliveira NS, Lima EDFA. Elaboration and implementation of a protocol for the Golden Hour of premature newborns using an Implementation Science lens. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023;31:e3957. doi:10.1590/1518-8345.6627.3957.

46. Silva LC, Lima EDFA, Oliveira NS, Entringer AP, Fonseca LMM, Primo CC. Interdisciplinary clinical protocol of therapeutic hypothermia for newborns with asphyxia: implementation research. Online Braz J Nurs. 2024;23:e20246774. doi:10.17665/1676-4285.20246774.

47. Oliveira G, Moreira ACA, Primo CC, Schimith MD. Software that qualifies nursing care for people with hypertension in primary health care. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2024;33:e20240077. doi:10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2024-0077en.